To the Editor:
Re “Trump Knows Dominance Wins,” by M. Steven Fish (Opinion visitor essay, Could 7):
It was that the 2 events disparaged one another for 3 months out of 4 years throughout election time. After that, they went again to hammering out useful insurance policies with civility, regardless of their completely different pursuits and philosophies. Governance labored, and democracy labored.
During the last 30 years one occasion step by step stopped caucusing and stopped making coverage and as a substitute stored testing the effectiveness of phrases of disparagement inside the world of discuss radio whereas cynically pandering to the ache of a giant phase of People.
That accelerated when a person who can stuff extra slurs and smears into one sentence than a sausage maker can stuff meat within the sausage took over the management of his occasion together with his genius for smearing his opponents.
Folks want to put in writing his sentences down one after the other to see the ugliness in each. His followers love him as a result of they suppose that his ugly phrases imply that he cares about them and is preventing for his or her welfare.
We’re near electing a would-be tyrant for the presidency 250 years after we revolted in opposition to a British monarchy — a tyrant who would persecute his opponents and abolish free elections with a “heads I win, tails you lose” philosophy.
Let’s cease speaking about “democracy” and begin speaking about “tyranny.”
Jerrold Bonn
Spring Home, Pa.
To the Editor:
Re “Wall Street Warms Up to Trump” (Enterprise, Could 16):
I’ve not often been as disgusted after studying a New York Occasions article as I used to be studying this one. The truth that these Wall Road Daddy Warbucks sorts are keen to place our democracy in danger by supporting a presidential candidate who has made his autocratic intentions fairly clear, apparently believing that they’ll make much more income beneath a second Donald Trump presidency, illustrates nothing if not their shortsightedness.
Aren’t these speculated to be the neatest guys within the room? Haven’t they learn the analysis displaying that democracy has a positive effect on per capita gross domestic product? How can they not see that the authoritarianism, amorality, cronyism and corruption of a second Trump presidency would weaken the techniques wherein they at the moment thrive, and would jeopardize their companies consequently?
Suppose twice, Wall Road titans. Placing our democracy in additional peril in your perceived monetary achieve dangers dropping each.
James Misak
Cleveland
To the Editor:
Re “From Decades of Reporting, a Long View of Hope,” by Nicholas Kristof (column, Could 12):
Whereas I’m heartened by Mr. Kristof’s excellent news on issues like decreasing poverty, bettering well being, and many others., his perception that America’s “dynamism and internal energy” can survive a second Donald Trump presidency, regardless of “4 years of nationwide misrule, chaos and subversion of democracy,” is naïve to me.
4 years of a president bent on destroying the setting would render all optimistic advances meaningless if we not have a planet wholesome sufficient to maintain us. Mr. Trump is a transparent and current hazard to all.
Sally Chrisman
Princeton, N.J.
To the Editor:
Re “Finding Someone to Help Is a Job in Itself” (Thursday Types, Could 16):
I beloved how Bianca Giaever was providing assist to strangers in New York Metropolis, and I truly do one thing comparable in L.A. I, too, need to assist folks, however I’ve a special method.
Humor has at all times been my go-to, and when Donald Trump was president I made a decision I wanted to do one thing. I got here up with a remedy sales space like Lucy’s within the Peanuts comics. Solely mine was coping with Trump-Induced Nervousness, “TheraTrumpy,” as I referred to as it.
It was a giant hit then, and I made a decision that I might deliver it again by standard demand and see if I may assist folks take care of this present nightmare by way of laughter and clever dialog. In addition to getting folks to smile or giggle, I additionally recommend respiration, meditation, not watching a lot information and a doll with orange hair that individuals can shake to vent.
I really feel that I’m doing L.A. an ideal service.
Denise McCanles
West Hollywood, Calif.
Justice Alito’s Upside-Down American Flag
To the Editor:
Re “At Alito’s Home, a ‘Stop the Steal’ Symbol Flew” (entrance web page, Could 17):
Justice Samuel Alito’s blame-the-wife protection for flying a “Cease the Steal” image at his dwelling exhibits contempt for the American folks, our democratic processes and the integrity of the courtroom on which he serves.
Lately, my very own home has displayed a “Justice for George Floyd” banner, an improvised Ukrainian flag and every December a “Bah Humbug” signal. In each case, my husband and I consulted earlier than it went up.
Might a person with each the ability and the clear inclination to form American lives not have managed no less than a “Hon, perhaps not an ideal look”?
Andrea R. Tebbets
Raleigh, N.C.
To the Editor:
Once I was rising up, I used to be taught that hanging an American flag the wrong way up was disrespectful. Apparently now, hanging the American flag the wrong way up is a logo of approving of Donald Trump.
To me, it’s a image of the world being turned the wrong way up, the place politically unsuitable is correct, revolt is patriotic and morals have been turned on their head.
Jimmy Burgoff
Belchertown, Mass.
Debate Floor Guidelines
To the Editor:
Re “Biden and Trump Agree to Debate Twice in Summer” (entrance web page, Could 16):
I hope that CNN and ABC will do the whole lot conceivable to rein in theatrics and encourage a substantive and civilized discourse by establishing floor guidelines for the upcoming presidential debates. A number of prospects come to thoughts:
1) Any candidate who interrupts his opponent shall forfeit time.
2) Any candidate who exceeds his allotted time by greater than 15 seconds shall have his microphone reduce off.
3) Candidate statements shall be verified by unbiased, real-time fact-checking, the outcomes of which will probably be aired earlier than the conclusion of the controversy.
The purpose right here have to be a chance to tell and educate the American citizens.
Gail Southard Canzano
West Hartford, Conn.
To the Editor:
Re “Disabled Adults Shouldn’t Have to Pay This Price to Marry,” by Pepper Stetler (Opinion visitor essay, Could 15):
Whereas the federal Supplemental Safety Earnings program discourages disabled adults from marrying by decreasing the advantages, my 75-year-old disabled brother couldn’t proceed to obtain our father’s navy pension from the federal Protection Finance Accounting Service ought to he marry. Had been he to marry, his major monetary assist would vanish.
My brother grew to become completely disabled when he was our father’s dependent little one. Our father selected much less of a pension when he retired after 31 years of Military service, together with fight in two wars, in order that upon his and our mom’s deaths my brother would obtain this very important monetary assist.
Suzanne O’Keefe
Brooklyn
Source link
