To the Editor:

Re “President Plans to Ease Deadline on Car Emissions” (entrance web page, Feb. 18):

It’s not shocking that Huge Auto, Huge Oil, automobile sellers and others have teamed as much as run the Environmental Safety Company’s draft auto pollution rules off the street. What’s shocking and appalling is that after the hottest 12 months on document and pledges to boldly confront the local weather disaster, the Biden administration is bowing to their unseemly stress.

The draft referred to as for a speedy ramp as much as requiring 67 p.c of recent vehicles, S.U.V.s and pickups to run on electrical energy by 2032. As a substitute, the administration will gradual the ramp up, delaying the swap to scrub electrical vehicles. This can imply America’s new vehicles will use extra oil, spew extra air pollution, intensify world warming and sicken extra youngsters with bronchial asthma.

Myopic automakers could revenue within the quick time period however pay in the long term when the world’s largest E.V. producer — China — seizes the market whereas American corporations produce extra of yesterday’s gasoline guzzlers.

U.S. automobile corporations by no means recovered the large market share they misplaced to Japanese corporations within the Nineteen Seventies and ’80s. They don’t appear to have realized from their previous fiasco.

Daniel F. Becker
Washington
The author is the director of the Heart for Organic Variety’s Secure Local weather Transport Marketing campaign.

To the Editor:

I’m not happy with this transformation in coverage, however on the very least, President Biden had higher keep and even enhance assist for E.V. purchases by the general public, akin to tax credits and growing the variety of charging stations.

If I purchase a brand new automobile will probably be an E.V., interval. I already drive a hybrid, however the time has come to go all the best way to E.V. And I hope different individuals available in the market for a brand new car will do the identical. The business will reply, as a result of the demand for E.V.’s is there.

Brian Schill
San Antonio

To the Editor:

Re “Trump Is Said to Favor Limit for Abortions” (entrance web page, Feb. 17), about experiences that Donald Trump helps a ban after 16 weeks with exceptions:

It needs to be no shock to anyone that Mr. Trump “has approached abortion transactionally,” and that he privately has mentioned he needs to keep away from committing himself on the difficulty till he has gained the nomination.

He has approached each difficulty in his life transactionally. Bob Woodward’s e-book “Worry” about Mr. Trump reported that when he was considering operating for president the primary time, he went to a conservative political activist for recommendation.

The person informed Mr. Trump that it will be tough for him to run as a Republican for a number of causes, one in every of which was that he had been an outspoken pro-choice supporter previously. “That may be mounted,” Mr. Trump replied. The swap was instantaneous, painless and completely unaccompanied by psychological anguish or soul-searching.

He in all probability offers extra thought to his reply when a waitress asks, “Would you want American cheese or cheddar in your burger, sir?”

David English
Acton, Mass.

To the Editor:

Re “Trump’s Allies Plan to Bolster Abortion Bans” (entrance web page, Feb. 18):

Studying in regards to the quite a few methods a second Trump administration may do materials hurt to abortion rights via government motion with none new legal guidelines, I used to be shocked by this callous sentence that was tossed off: “A 16-week ban would have an effect on solely a small fraction of abortions, given that just about 94 p.c occur within the first trimester, earlier than 13 weeks of being pregnant.”

Such a ban would have an effect on one hundred pc of pregnancies through which deadly diagnoses for the fetus are made at the usual 20-week ultrasound, dooming these ladies to danger their well being persevering with pregnancies solely to ship infants they might then watch die.

The information is stuffed with such tales from purple states with post-Roe abortion bans that fake to have medical exceptions. Abortion is finest left to sufferers, their households and their docs. The selection on this election couldn’t be extra clear.

Andrew Ross
Denver
The author is an obstetrician-gynecologist.

To the Editor:

Navalny’s Widow Accepts Mantle of the Opposition” (entrance web page, Feb. 20) introduced tears to my eyes. Preserving alive the reminiscence and work of this brave man who gave his life preventing tyranny in Russia on behalf of the unjustly oppressed will assist rally others to affix the trigger.

I suggest the institution of an Aleksei Navalny Prize to be awarded to a worthy particular person who meets his customary of braveness and moral precept within the combat for freedom towards tyranny. A few of the funds can be utilized to assist Mr. Navalny’s spouse, Yulia Navalnaya, and different Russian freedom fighters advance this trigger.

Kenneth Rosenbaum
New York

To the Editor:

Re “Reeling From $450 Million Penalty, Trump Hawks $400 Shoes” (nytimes.com, Feb. 18), about Donald Trump’s promotion of Trump-branded sneakers:

Anyone who buys a pair of $399 gold sneakers goes to need to ask themselves whether or not their private economic system isn’t doing just a bit bit higher than they (and Mr. Trump) have been saying it’s. And in the event that they don’t, we owe it to ourselves to counsel it for them.

Claudia Lynch
New Orleans


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Brown v. Board of Education at 70

American historical past is replete with paradigm-shifting, landscape-altering, game-changing moments. Brown v.…

What’s the most likely verdict in Trump’s hush money trial?

After 20 days, 22 witnesses and intermittent courtroom fireworks, the proof in…

Is this the state’s secret plan for the tent crisis? – Daily News

The scenario with tent encampments, everybody agreed, had develop into completely unacceptable.…

Court right to charge Israel and Hamas?: Letters – Daily News

The president and the speaker have it proper President Biden and Speaker…