Los Angeles college board candidate Graciela Ortiz has been faraway from her job as an L.A. Unified counseling administrator pending a confidential investigation, college district officers confirmed, main a school-employees union to withdraw its endorsement of her for the March 5 election.
The investigation was launched after a civil lawsuit was filed alleging Ortiz and a political ally are answerable for the actions of a marketing campaign employee, who pleaded no contest to sexual misconduct with an underage volunteer. Each the perpetrator and sufferer have been concerned in marketing campaign work in 2021 for Ortiz and Efren Martinez, based on the go well with, filed Jan. 9 in Los Angeles County Superior Court docket.
Martinez is operating for the 57th state Meeting district, which takes in components of downtown L.A., South L.A. and southeast L.A. County. Ortiz is a Huntington Park Metropolis Council member operating to characterize District 5, which runs north to south alongside an japanese swath of the Los Angeles Unified Faculty District, taking in Eagle Rock and cities together with Maywood and Bell.
Within the legal case, Billy Valdivia, the marketing campaign employee, additionally pleaded no contest to a weapons cost, based on courtroom information. He’s additionally a defendant within the civil go well with.
The go well with seeks unspecified damages for the feminine sexual-abuse sufferer, recognized as “B.A.”
An legal professional for Ortiz and Martinez, Robert P. Sievers, demanded that the case be dropped in a letter to the plaintiff’s legal professional, calling the allegations “malicious and defamatory” in addition to a rigorously timed political “smear.”
Neither Ortiz nor Martinez answered questions submitted to them through electronic mail from The Instances. Nor did they consent to be interviewed. Neither Sievers nor attorneys from Lyfe Regulation, which additionally has been representing Ortiz and Martinez, responded to emailed questions.
Political advisor Mike Trujillo offered a blanket assertion by textual content and electronic mail to detailed questions.
“Like Taylor Swift’s track ‘Shake It Off’ the courtroom will dismiss this politically motivated lawsuit. Additionally each main public security group like our personal LAUSD college cops have endorsed Councilwoman Graciela Ortiz as a result of they know she’s going to make our colleges safer,” mentioned Trujillo, who added that he is also working for candidates within the three different board races.
“That is our reply/remark to each query you’ve gotten requested,” he added in a textual content.
Ortiz, 43, misplaced an earlier bid for the varsity board in 2019 to Jackie Goldberg, who is retiring. Ortiz’s council submit is part-time. Her full-time job has been as a college assist administrator overseeing counselors. However in the course of the occasions associated within the lawsuit, she was a college counselor, as she had been most of her district profession, which started in 2006.
L.A. Unified confirmed that Ortiz has been faraway from her place “pending the result of a proper investigation,” a district spokesperson mentioned. The district declined to offer extra info.
Citing the problems raised within the lawsuit and the continuing investigation, one union, Chapter 500 of California Faculty Workers Assn., has withdrawn its endorsement of Ortiz. That union represents about 4,000 workers, together with library aides and clerical and enterprise service workers at colleges.
Ortiz is supported by the marketing campaign’s greatest spender: Native 99 of Service Workers Worldwide Union, which represents about 30,000 workers together with cafeteria staff, custodians, instructor aides, safety aides and bus drivers.
Native 99 spent $708,191 via Friday on behalf of Ortiz, and in addition has offered members to marketing campaign door to door.
Ortiz “has persistently demonstrated a profound dedication to supporting kids and households,” Native 99 spokesperson Blanca Gallegos mentioned Thursday. “From our understanding, it was Graciela’s cooperation within the investigation of the incident that led to” the no contest plea by Valdivia.
A marketing campaign volunteer
Throughout the 2018-19 college yr, B.A. attended Marquez Excessive Faculty in Huntington Park. She received to know Ortiz, who was a counselor and the college advisor to the Key Membership, to which the coed belonged, based on the lawsuit.
Ortiz recruited B.A. and different college students to work on her unsuccessful 2019 school board campaign, a particular election to fill an open seat, the lawsuit states. The COVID-19 pandemic closed colleges in March 2020, however B.A. reconnected with Ortiz later that yr at a Christmas toy drive, the lawsuit states.
On the urging of Ortiz, B.A. joined in one other marketing campaign effort in early 2021 to assist Martinez win election to the native Democratic Celebration Government Committee, based on the go well with.
Additionally concerned within the 2021 effort for Martinez was Valdivia, described within the lawsuit as a “private pal” of Martinez who created video and promoting for the marketing campaign workplace and drove volunteers round as they carried out marketing campaign work.
The go well with alleges that Ortiz “was the first individual accountable for the marketing campaign, organizing the volunteers and giving talks every day on the marketing campaign headquarters to instruct the volunteers on what to do, together with interactions with Billy Valdivia,” who helped direct the efforts of the younger volunteers.
Valdivia, who was 44 on the time, socialized with underage college students, bought alcohol for them and drove them round, based on the lawsuit. He would drop off B.A. final, regularly grooming the 16-year-old right into a sexual relationship, typically taking her to his condominium, the lawsuit alleges.
B.A. advised her household concerning the bodily contact — and so they notified Huntington Park police, who arrange a sting, based on the go well with. B.A. requested a one-on-one assembly with Valdivia, and when he arrived — driving a automobile borrowed from Martinez — officers arrested him, the lawsuit states.
Officers discovered photographs and video on Valdivia’s telephone that supported B.A.’s account, based on the lawsuit. On the time of his arrest, he was carrying an unregistered firearm. At the least one different weapon was discovered at his residence, the lawsuit states.
Valdivia was charged with three felony counts associated to weapons and one misdemeanor depend for annoying or molesting a sufferer youthful than 18. He pleaded no contest to 2 counts: improperly carrying a loaded firearm in public and the annoyance/molestation depend, based on legal courtroom information.
He obtained a two-year suspended sentence that included credit score for 46 days in custody and needed to register as a intercourse offender, courtroom information present.
Lawsuit questions
At difficulty within the civil lawsuit in opposition to Martinez and Ortiz is whether or not they have been negligent in hiring and supervising Valdivia and permitting him to work together with minors.
The lawsuit alleges that Ortiz and Martinez ought to have carried out a background examine on Valdivia, and, that if they’d, they’d have discovered courtroom information displaying that he was a possible threat.
A evaluation of restricted courtroom paperwork, which embrace a reputation and a case quantity, point out that a person named Billy Valdivia confronted gun expenses within the Nineties. The Instances was unable to confirm if it’s the identical individual as a result of the case information, which would come with a date of beginning, have been destroyed.
The courtroom information additionally present a home dispute involving a person named Billy Valdivia with the identical beginning date because the marketing campaign employee. On this case, Valdivia’s then-wife alleged he was violent and sought a restraining order in opposition to him, based on courtroom paperwork. The restraining order was briefly in pressure. There isn’t any indication that expenses have been filed.
Each the weapons instances and the home dispute occurred greater than 20 years in the past.
Valdivia and his legal professional on the legal case, Albert Robles, didn’t reply to emails and telephone calls from The Instances.
In his letter — emailed to The Instances by B.A.’s legal professional — Sievers denied a connection between B.A. and the campaigns of Ortiz and Martinez: “This declare additionally will not be true as B.A. was by no means a volunteer or part of the 2020 campaigns and nobody within the marketing campaign is aware of her.”
Nevertheless, Mike Navia, a former Huntington Park Police Division detective who supervised the case, mentioned that B.A. was a marketing campaign volunteer in the course of the related interval and had common contact with Ortiz, Martinez and Valdivia.
Navia now not works for town, having misplaced his job within the wake of a public dispute when, as a police union chief, he criticized metropolis officers, together with Ortiz.
Thomas Scully, B.A.’s legal professional, produced a letter of advice that Ortiz wrote praising B.A.’s marketing campaign assist in 2019.
He added it’s customary observe for a sufferer to sue an employer as a result of the perpetrator usually has no property to recuperate as damages.
“The obligation of care is heightened on this case as a result of the sufferer was a minor,” Scully mentioned. “She had been enticed from a college setting the place there was a particular relationship between herself and a former college counselor that might lull her into an affordable perception that she, as a volunteer, could be taken care of.”
Source link
