As soon as once more with “Impeachment of Mayorkas rightly dismissed” (April 19), the newspaper editors present their priorities in failing to even point out the current and rising multi-faceted hazard of our open borders. Little doubt most all People need our immigration insurance policies reformed, however what we overwhelmingly count on and should demand at first is a safe border.

With this administration, now we have no border safety and successfully no border.

For People now so in peril all through the nation, we should do all we will to demand a safe border like we loved previous to Biden and Mayorkas.

If Mayorkas’ impeachment may have been debated, People and Congress would have at the least been in a position to pressure the unbelievable hazard of our state of affairs absolutely into the nationwide mild of day.

— Steve Shatynski, Brea

 

Welfare reform

Re “It’s time to eradicate and change our nation’s welfare packages” (April 21):

Studying David Pan’s opinion leaves me questioning if I dwell in bizarro world. He advises taking earned Social Safety profit away. how the federal finances multiplied 10 instances within the final 20 years, whereas earned Social Safety advantages solely went up half of that, looks like taxpayers have been cheated and now Pan desires to take all of it and dilute it additional by giving it to anybody 21 or older. Jogs my memory of the Democrats right here in California, taxing employees and residents extra to reward homeless (80% will not be native Californians). All that tax cash ought to go to assist employees purchase and pay for properties. This may additional assist our economic system as dwelling gross sales embrace all of the equipment and enhance county and metropolis taxes.

— Michael Sanchez, Hemet

 

Google workers protest in opposition to Undertaking Nimbus

Re “28 Google workers fired over Gaza protest” (April 19):

If workers will not be pleased with their administration’s choices, they should resign and discover a like-minded firm to work for, not dictate to administration to alter their insurance policies. They selected to work for this firm, they weren’t pressured to take action.

Suppose you don’t like your supervisor’s persona or administration abilities. Is it as much as you to pressure him to alter?

No, it’s as much as you to seek out new employment.

— Lea Osborne, Woodland Hills

 


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Mainstream media bias against conservatives and libertarians – Daily News

On CNN, a “reporter” interviewing Vice President Kamala Harris gushes, “I’m struck,…

Brown v. Board of Education at 70

American historical past is replete with paradigm-shifting, landscape-altering, game-changing moments. Brown v.…

Is this 2024 or 1934?

Ah, springtime. A time of renewal, of blossoming, of sunshine and heat…

The Teamsters’ campaign against AVs isn’t really about safety – Daily News

Automobile crashes killed more individuals in Los Angeles than homicides in 2023,…